Dirty Words

Cover your virgin ears, we’re about to dive into the vile netherworld of profanity.

This topic polarizes people. On one side are the folks who preface every decision with “is it good for the children?” On the other are the reasonable ones. Kidding. Sort of. Words have power because we ascribe it to them. Our little linguistic elected officials. It’s like the time I was doing the crossword and asked my mother for a four-letter word for a woman that ended in “U-N-T,” and she glared at me in disgust, only to learn that the missing letter was “A.” Who’s the one with the vulgar mind? Are your genitals actually evil, or is it just the fact that someone calls it a pussy that makes it so? (Yes, I squirmed just a little typing that word, myself.)

Same applies to writing. There are times when you want to go with the medically-correct terms to establish an atmosphere of sterility or professionalism. Other times, say if writing a sex/love scene, you might want to use sensual-sounding descriptors and the nouns that go with them. Even so, the same scene could be written in vile, dirty slang and convey something completely different even though the act itself was the exact same. It’s the teller’s point-of-view, and men and women are not exclusive to either style. The film A History of Violence has two such scenes where the tone is drastically different after the character has arced.

I personally find it difficult to relate to those who never curse. Yet I often think less of those who do it to excess, as it’s likely a compensation for a poor vocab. One friend starts off nearly every sentence with “Fuckin’,” his little Tourettic placeholder to buy time to formulate what he really wants to say, which could be about anything from spirituality to actual fucking. Then there are those who only curse around certain groups of people and not others. They are not to be trusted.

When I was a kid, it was not a child’s world. Our base needs took priority of course, but we were at the mercy of adults’ wishes, socially and behaviorally. People smoked in front of us, PG-rated movies had some adult-themed content, and it was completely appropriate for Uncle John to call me “a little shit.” Unlike now where parents use their kids as excuse generators, bow to their every demand, and Disneyfy their entire family’s existence in a coccoon of innocence. But that has the makings of a rant, and we’re here to explore so-called crude language. Sorry. Anyway, you’re not creating art if you compromise your work to not offend everyone. And we know that the more you forbid or repress a child, the more driven they are to rebel against it. If she’s not shielded from knowing what a bitch is, she’ll be less likely to snap and call you one at Thanksgiving dinner when she’s twelve.

Jeez, jeepers, jeesh, gee-whiz, Jiminy Christmas, criminy, etc. These are all exclamations that came about as a substitute for using Jesus Christ in vain. Used by the same people who choke out the word fiddlesticks or doggonnit after slamming their hand in the door. Their nostrils flare, neck veins bulging with just as much rage as any heathen would experience in the same situation, only they hold their breath first and struggle through that first syllable. They want to say it. And if you believe in the same type of god they do, don’t you think he knows that, too? They’ve already uttered it in their brain two seconds before, just as they mentally coveted their neighbor’s wife while procreating with their own, and then lied about it. Best to just say it and clear your conscience.

But . . . the fact that some don’t, makes the world just a little more interesting. The yang to Tarantino’s ying. For better or worse, repressed or liberated, puritanical or potty-mouthed, this is who they are and it’s part of their character that you can exploit to dramatic effect. Of course there’s the subtext that really tells you about them. The gritting teeth and near-aneurism underlying the “dagnabbit” says so much more than their words ever could.

I’ve got a detailed post about dialogue coming soon, but one hallmark of great writing is that attribution is almost unnecessary. The individuals’ speech patterns and verbal command should be distinct enough to tell the characters apart without needing “he said” after every phrase. Remember that the words themselves are rather meaningless; it’s context we’re after, so rather than generic expletives, consider having them reflect their owner’s personality, like, “ah, shit on a shingle” or “you cockblocking nerf-herder.” Or maybe they’re the timid type to disguise it, like “shittake mushrooms” or “motherfather.”

In case my overarching point was muddled, strong language has more impact when it’s not used to excess. This is why some stand-up comics have the audience howling the first time they say “fuck,” and others need it just to complete an unfunny sentence. But excess works if it’s in service to the character, as does abstinence. Aside from dialogue, it’s best to avoid most profanity in descriptive passages, unless written first-person or by another character in the story, as it calls attention to the supposed anonymous, omnicient narrator.

This message has not been approved by Ned Flanders.

Posted in writing | Comments Off on Dirty Words

Truths, Vol. 2

• Ego only becomes an obstacle when it’s not yours.

• Some natives believe that each photo captures part of your soul. Do the red carpet math to understand the vapidity of celebs.

• Every minute spent rehearsing prolongs your career by the same amount.

• Give someone a wireless if you want them to stand still.

• Editing requires objectivity, which is why most editors are single or divorced.

• You can’t copyright a title, but if anyone tries to steal Rabbi Sanjeev and the Periwinkle Valise of Intrigue, I’ll sue the motherfucking Burberry off their back faster than you can say Neo-Hassidic espionage.

• Drummers make their living counting time, yet are rarely on it.

• A picture is worth a lot more than a thousand words in the porn business. Fortunately, trading volume is low.

• Batteries always die far too young; bring life support.

• Of belief, faith, and ideas, ideas are the only one with actual value.

• Reputation attracts more quality associations than does pay.

• The definition of success constantly evolves for the truly ambitious.

• Writing what you know is as exciting as having an affair with your spouse.

• Always factor in time for the unfactorable.

• Consider retirement when the list of people you hope to someday work with becomes shorter than those you refuse to work with.

• It’s not a documentary if you set out with an agenda.

• No photo tells a story; its viewer does, and each uniquely.

• If Beethoven were alive and working in music today, deafness would be to his professional advantage.

• The medium is really only part of the message. The rest is the message.

Posted in humor | Tagged | Comments Off on Truths, Vol. 2

The Dead Kennedys Were Tame

I am obsessed with unusual band names, and I confess to keeping a running list on my laptop that I’ll add to whenever inspiration strikes. You never know when your polka-core group is going to take off. . . Anyway, in my online travels, here are some others that I’ve stumbled over that put my own to shame.

The Sphinctones
Baldilox
The Boxing Ghandis
Lady Chatterly’s Hampster
Toxic Shock
Jif & the Choosy Mothers
Hugh Jorgen
The Gaza Strippers
Dreaded Apparatus
Honkys Hung Like Donkeys
Cap’n Crunch & the Cereal Killers
The Phenobarbidols
New Squids on the Dock
Barry White Boys
The Kitshickers
Jehovah’s Wetness
The Yeastie Girls
Operation: Cliff Claven
Bjorn Again
The Glands of External Secretion
Resurrectum
Joan of Arkansas
The Hostile Amish
Pumpin’ Ethyl
The Elastic Sausage
JFKFC
Vic Tayback & the Violent Payback
Bill Bixby’s Big-Ass Communist Eighteen-Wheeler

Posted in humor, music | 1 Comment

Manufacturing Fear

Depending on who you listen to, our greatest fears as humans are either: terrorists, spiders, and death; or loss of identity, rejection, and humiliation. There’s not much documentation to support a collective fear of Slovakian hostels, finger-knives, the undead, mechagodzillas, videocassettes, chainsaws, birds, or demonic possession. None of us are actually scouring the pre-flight cockpit for vipers, researching indian burial protocol before breaking ground on our swimming pool, or carrying a sharpened stake to visit grandma in the cemetery. These are temporary scares that instinct and generations of natural selection have told us are not to be internalized long-term. Tensing at the sight of a snake, failing our equilibrium on the roof – these are legit situations with potential dire consequences where biology overrides experience.

It’s odd that often what we fear most are things least likely to occur. You’d have to fly in an airplane every day for 19,000 years before a statistical crash caught up with you. Swim 11 million times in the ocean before a shark bit you (with zero percent chance of resulting death). These are what we lose sleep over, yet the three leading causes of death are: tobacco, poor diet/inactivity, and alcohol. Sounds like a lovely little Tuesday evening to me.

So look for my new screenplay next summer, The Scariest Movie Ever Made. Our hero has not saved enough for retirement in spite of looming layoffs. He discovers Evil Spider-Man stole his social security number, ruined his credit rating, and is alleging molestation of his kidnapped children. Root canal is scheduled for the afternoon, and it’s an Alaskan winter with no electricity. After giving him the clap, his wife leaves him for a man with a bigger penis, about which she’s told the entire neighborhood. It climaxes with him preparing a speech full of ethnic slurs in front of al Qaeda’s top brass. Now that’s terrifying!

Posted in writing | Comments Off on Manufacturing Fear

Truths, Vol. 1

I’ve learned a thing or two in this business. A lot of businesses, actually. And if I can prevent just one of you from making the same mistakes I’ve made, it will all be worth it. Okay, that’s horseshit. But I needed an introductory paragraph, and the illusion of altruism was too alluring (as was alliteration, apparently). On with the list.

• A camera may add 10 pounds, but it removes 30 IQ points.

• The artfulness of a lyric is inversely proportional to its intelligibility.

• You can only sleep your way to the middle.

• The best words to tell a story are the fewest.

Charisma and intelligence are not mutually-exclusive. But throw talent into the mix, and you can pick only two.

• If you save your best song for the encore, you won’t get one.

• Keep the money people separate from the decision makers.

• Lighting a set will take twice as much time as allocated, yet half as much as it should.

• Eventually, effort trumps talent.

• Presenting a client with a lame option for the sole purpose of rejection is risky, because they may well select it.

• Actors who need your direction most, won’t take it.

• Major-seventh chords have no place in rock ‘n’ roll.

• The writer is both the most important person in the room and the worst at expressing herself.

• A TelePrompTer is only as useful as the skill of its copywriter.

• If you can’t repeat a sentence from memory directly after reading it, it’s too long.

• Don’t let an engineer produce your recording session, or vice-versa.

• The importance of the data is inversely proportional to the hard drive’s reliability.

• Never trust anyone who is incapable of being on time.

• I will say anything you want to hear if it will improve your performance.

• If something sounds good, then it is good.

• There are two kinds of people in the world: those who like to place people into little categories, and those who don’t.

• No one ever gets what they want without trying something new.

I heard those last few somewhere else.

Posted in humor | Tagged | Comments Off on Truths, Vol. 1

Red Zone Writing

It’s a great feeling when you can “see the light” at the end of a long-form work like a novel. A premature sense of accomplishment sets in, followed by the creeping dread of anxiety. But how the hell am I supposed to get from Q to Z in 40 pages?

A football analogy is appropriate. Great, so you’re on the defense’s 20 yard line and that touchdown is in sight. But the closer you get to the end zone, the more the field shrinks, the less ground the defense must to cover to stop you, and your play-calling is limited to what can be accomplished within that space.

Analogies are clever and all, but we need solutions. Results.

Countless books and movies falter in the third act. They’re so near that finish line, but the human drive for closure rushes them toward it like some desert mirage of salvation. They don’t take advantage of the weapons in their arsenal that got them this far. Character development dies as it becomes merely a vehicle for plot resolution. People act in ways contrary to their nature. The sentences get shorter, description briefer. Zeus reaches down from the heavens with the answer to the central dilemma.

I say fuck the end zone. Right now, your target is probably still way up in section 349. Don’t be fooled into thinking all you have to do is hit that 250-page mark, or 20-page mark, or whatever. There is no wall waiting to crash into; space is infinite. Your story is complete when it’s damn well complete. For now, write from point Q to point R, then R to S, and so on until you arrive at Z naturally, being neither contrived nor concerned for length. Do not change your game plan just because you think an ending is expected soon.

This is what editing is for: chipping away and whittling your masterpiece down to its most efficient form. And you must be merciless. Be prepared to “kill your darlings,” as someone once said. Take some time away from the material and come back fresh and objective when you aren’t still on honeymoon with your own words. Any scenes that don’t advance the plot or reveal character must go. I’m sure they’re brilliant, and you can keep those trims in your personal “director’s cut” journal to marvel over for years to come. But they don’t belong in my $24 copy. I don’t care about your linguistic genius; thrill me with a great story that doesn’t sell out in the third act.

FYI, modern novels tend to be around 60-80,000 words and 250-ish words per page.

Posted in writing | 2 Comments

Space. Time. Continuum.

A saw a prototype of this a couple of years ago and promptly forgot all about it. Then last week I was watching the new Dream Theater live DVD Score, where their world-class keyboard player Jordan Rudess was rocking one of these. A very cool instrument that’s somewhere between a theremin and a lap steel guitar, called the Haken Continuum.

What’s unique about it is that you play in X, Y, and Z space (left to right, top to bottom, and up to down – ie. pressure) just by moving your finger(s) over the surface. Each of these movements can be mapped to any paramenter such as pitch, velocity, sustain, etc. for maximum expression possibilities including natural-sounding vibrato, swells, and morphing, with plenty of resolution for continuous slides. This is all registered as MIDI data, which can control any virtual instrument patch, from a Roland Sound Canvas to a Kyma to your stage synthesizer. It sounds like whatever you plug it into. All of these controls can be done simultaneously with one hand, freeing up your other for another keyboard, Chapman Stick, or throwing up the metal horns.

Here are a few samples of it in action:

Jordan Rudess (very Floydian slide guitar)

plucks

fretless bass

additive synthesis

Posted in music | 1 Comment

Theme vs. Plot

I haven’t really written anything yet because I’m struggling to come up with a theme for [the book]. Also, would you agree that all the stories have already been told before?

Yes, there’s really nothing new under the sun from a high-concept standpoint. Look at how many times the Pride & Prejudice tale has been reinterpreted: Bridget Jones’s Diary, Clueless, etc. Don’t beat your head into the padded wall over the singular goal of coming up with some idea that “has never been done before,” and then praise your own genius when you finally do, because at its base level, it probably has. Killer storytelling trumps originality every single time. Besides, the true originality is revealed in the details. How your particular characters, in all their quirks, respond to the situations. The metaphors you create and the words you use to flesh them out.

Theme should not be a target to write to. It’s like swinging at a pinata after you’ve been blinded and spun. Worse, it will probably reek of soapbox-prophet morality. Plot is what you’re actually struggling with (I hope). To me, theme is sort of a natural conclusion. It’s something you don’t really find until you’ve written a majority of the work already. In revision mode, a keen eye will notice some repeating elements, some common threads or undercurrents that run through the piece. Once identified, focus on just two or three of them and rework the associated passages to support or enhance those concepts.

If you agree there are a finite number of stories out there, then there are certainly only a handful of themes to go with them. Redemption, man vs. nature, revenge, love conquers all, etc. That’s why you shouldn’t start there; it’s far too vast to inspire. Begin with specifics, and broaden your scope as you go.

Unlike plot, theme is not something that should necessarily appear obvious upon a casual read, nor should it be required to enjoy it. It’s more of a feeling than a fact, and deepens the meaning once understood. Sort of like the right-brain’s interpretation of what the left-brain has told it.

Posted in writing | Tagged | Comments Off on Theme vs. Plot